Tactics Journal

by Kyle Boas

Analyzing football tactics

The holding midfield and fullback monopoly

If it were up to me, fullbacks and holding midfielders would be learning to play as center-backs while midfielders and wingers would be learning to play as fullbacks. The modern game demands that you are good with the ball at your feet.

A position is but a constraint you put on a player. They can play in any position, other than as a goalkeeper. You need experience in practice to fill in for a goalkeeper. I think it limits the player’s potential when you label them a center-back or fullback. Why can’t they play other positions?

Figure 1.1 - The rotations of Declan Rice, Moises Caicedo, Amadou Onana, Aurélien Tchouaméni, Khéphren Thuram-Ulien, and Carlos Baleba.

Imagine a center-back, fullback, and holding midfield backfield made up of Declan Rice, Moises Caicedo, Amadou Onana, Aurélien Tchouaméni, Khéphren Thuram-Ulien, and Carlos Baleba. There’s a better combination of players that I can’t think of right now, but with that amount of athleticism, technical prowess, dribbling, and passing ability to play in all three positions. All of those players rotating in and out of the wide areas, the back line, and the midfield. Then they are all capable of helping higher up the pitch. The opposition wouldn’t be able to keep track of them. It would be dizzying and exciting.

The traditional center-backs like Gabriel, Ibrahima Konaté, or the Levi Colwill’s of the world would have to adapt the movements or be left out. They are adapting now so it shouldn’t be that hard.

Holding midfielders and fullbacks that can play in both the midfield, defense, and out wide are incredibly rare. Why not collect all of them? You’d have a massive competitive advantage, a monopoly.

Reply Back to top Email this post Copy link

To view all of the posts, visit the archive or search on the homepage.